QPQ-AG/hakuzaru
11
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 3 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Hakuzaru is unnecessarily strict about ak_ vs ct_ prefixes #10

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-18 11:09:19 +09:00 by spivee · 1 comment
spivee commented 2025-11-18 11:09:19 +09:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

This is more of a note for myself, but if you try to pass in a ct_ to a function that expects an arbitrary address, (which can include contracts!) then it complains. Also, if a function returns an address that happens to be a contract, hakuzaru is blind to this, and wraps it up as ak_, even though technically the address binary has enough info to deduce whether it is a contract or an ECDSA account.

This is more of a note for myself, but if you try to pass in a ct_ to a function that expects an arbitrary address, (which can include contracts!) then it complains. Also, if a function returns an address that happens to be a contract, hakuzaru is blind to this, and wraps it up as ak_, even though technically the address binary has enough info to deduce whether it is a contract or an ECDSA account.
zxq9 commented 2026-05-10 16:15:02 +09:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

The recipient case is a bit strict indeed.

This should fix it: #23

The recipient case is a bit strict indeed. This should fix it: https://git.qpq.swiss/QPQ-AG/hakuzaru/pulls/23
zxq9 closed this issue 2026-05-10 17:57:14 +09:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something is not working
 duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
 enhancement
New feature
 help wanted
Need some help
 invalid
Something is wrong
 pig lipstick
Muggle-facing enhancements
 question
More information is needed
 wontfix
This won't be fixed
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
Dagadunn Pickmick dimitar.p.ivanov flambard (Markus Flambard) gchewy hans_sv pharpend spivee (Jarvis Carroll) thescientress (Cecille de Jesus) uwiger (Ulf Wiger) zxq9 (Craig Everett)
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: QPQ-AG/hakuzaru#10
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?