Previously, the template supported only [type()], denoting a list where all elements are of the same type. This made it tricky to extend the list pattern. Also, complex subtypes aren't necessarily that descriptive:
| #{items := [{field_name(), type()}]} %% Record with named fields represented as a map. Encoded as a list in the given order.
*Created by: radrow*
Comment please
```suggestion:-0+0
| #{items := [{field_name(), type()}]} %% Record with named fields represented as a map. Encoded as a list in the given order.
```
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Add support for decoding sub-structures.
Example:
Previously, the template supported only
[type()], denoting a list where all elements are of the same type. This made it tricky to extend the list pattern. Also, complex subtypes aren't necessarily that descriptive:The serialization would look like this:
Created by: radrow
Comment please
Created by: radrow
Check for duplicates in
Items?I guess we could, but there will be runtime overhead to catch what would be a compile-time error.
Created by: radrow
Review: Approved
approved this merge request
Merged by: uwiger at 2023-08-18 12:40:50 UTC