sophia/test/aeso_compiler_tests.erl
Hans Svensson 4324bfd49e Add bytes(int), add address_literalsm add ecverify_secp25k1
hash -> bytes(32)
signature -> bytes(64)
address literals
2019-04-23 10:40:02 +02:00

306 lines
14 KiB
Erlang

%%% -*- erlang-indent-level:4; indent-tabs-mode: nil -*-
%%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
%%% @copyright (C) 2018, Aeternity Anstalt
%%% @doc Test Sophia language compiler.
%%%
%%% @end
%%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
-module(aeso_compiler_tests).
-compile([export_all, nowarn_export_all]).
-include_lib("eunit/include/eunit.hrl").
%% Very simply test compile the given contracts. Only basic checks
%% are made on the output, just that it is a binary which indicates
%% that the compilation worked.
simple_compile_test_() ->
[ {"Testing the " ++ ContractName ++ " contract",
fun() ->
case compile(ContractName) of
#{byte_code := ByteCode,
contract_source := _,
type_info := _} -> ?assertMatch(Code when is_binary(Code), ByteCode);
ErrBin ->
io:format("\n~s", [ErrBin]),
error(ErrBin)
end
end} || ContractName <- compilable_contracts() ] ++
[ {"Testing error messages of " ++ ContractName,
fun() ->
case compile(ContractName) of
<<"Type errors\n", ErrorString/binary>> ->
check_errors(lists:sort(ExpectedErrors), ErrorString);
<<"Parse errors\n", ErrorString/binary>> ->
check_errors(lists:sort(ExpectedErrors), ErrorString)
end
end} ||
{ContractName, ExpectedErrors} <- failing_contracts() ] ++
[ {"Testing include with explicit files",
fun() ->
FileSystem = maps:from_list(
[ begin
{ok, Bin} = file:read_file(filename:join([aeso_test_utils:contract_path(), File])),
{File, Bin}
end || File <- ["included.aes", "../contracts/included2.aes"] ]),
#{byte_code := Code1} = compile("include", [{include, {explicit_files, FileSystem}}]),
#{byte_code := Code2} = compile("include"),
?assertMatch(true, Code1 == Code2)
end} ] ++
[ {"Testing deadcode elimination",
fun() ->
#{ byte_code := NoDeadCode } = compile("nodeadcode"),
#{ byte_code := DeadCode } = compile("deadcode"),
SizeNoDeadCode = byte_size(NoDeadCode),
SizeDeadCode = byte_size(DeadCode),
?assertMatch({_, _, true}, {SizeDeadCode, SizeNoDeadCode, SizeDeadCode + 40 < SizeNoDeadCode}),
ok
end} ].
check_errors(Expect, ErrorString) ->
%% This removes the final single \n as well.
Actual = binary:split(<<ErrorString/binary,$\n>>, <<"\n\n">>, [global,trim]),
case {Expect -- Actual, Actual -- Expect} of
{[], Extra} -> ?assertMatch({unexpected, []}, {unexpected, Extra});
{Missing, []} -> ?assertMatch({missing, []}, {missing, Missing});
{Missing, Extra} -> ?assertEqual(Missing, Extra)
end.
compile(Name) ->
compile(Name, [{include, {file_system, [aeso_test_utils:contract_path()]}}]).
compile(Name, Options) ->
String = aeso_test_utils:read_contract(Name),
case aeso_compiler:from_string(String, [{src_file, Name} | Options]) of
{ok, Map} -> Map;
{error, ErrorString} -> ErrorString
end.
%% compilable_contracts() -> [ContractName].
%% The currently compilable contracts.
compilable_contracts() ->
["complex_types",
"counter",
"dutch_auction",
"environment",
"factorial",
"fundme",
"identity",
"maps",
"oracles",
"remote_call",
"simple",
"simple_storage",
"spend_test",
"stack",
"test",
"builtin_bug",
"builtin_map_get_bug",
"nodeadcode",
"deadcode",
"variant_types",
"state_handling",
"events",
"include",
"basic_auth",
"bitcoin_auth",
"address_literals"
].
%% Contracts that should produce type errors
failing_contracts() ->
[ {"name_clash",
[<<"Duplicate definitions of abort at\n"
" - (builtin location)\n"
" - line 14, column 3">>,
<<"Duplicate definitions of double_def at\n"
" - line 10, column 3\n"
" - line 11, column 3">>,
<<"Duplicate definitions of double_proto at\n"
" - line 4, column 3\n"
" - line 5, column 3">>,
<<"Duplicate definitions of proto_and_def at\n"
" - line 7, column 3\n"
" - line 8, column 3">>,
<<"Duplicate definitions of put at\n"
" - (builtin location)\n"
" - line 15, column 3">>,
<<"Duplicate definitions of state at\n"
" - (builtin location)\n"
" - line 16, column 3">>]}
, {"type_errors",
[<<"Unbound variable zz at line 17, column 21">>,
<<"Cannot unify int\n"
" and list(int)\n"
"when checking the application at line 26, column 9 of\n"
" (::) : (int, list(int)) => list(int)\n"
"to arguments\n"
" x : int\n"
" x : int">>,
<<"Cannot unify string\n"
" and int\n"
"when checking the assignment of the field\n"
" x : map(string, string) (at line 9, column 46)\n"
"to the old value __x and the new value\n"
" __x {[\"foo\"] @ x = x + 1} : map(string, int)">>,
<<"Cannot unify int\n"
" and string\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 34, column 45\n"
" 1 : int\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" string">>,
<<"Cannot unify string\n"
" and int\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 34, column 50\n"
" \"bla\" : string\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" int">>,
<<"Cannot unify string\n"
" and int\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 32, column 18\n"
" \"x\" : string\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" int">>,
<<"Cannot unify string\n"
" and int\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 11, column 56\n"
" \"foo\" : string\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" int">>,
<<"Cannot unify int\n"
" and string\n"
"when comparing the types of the if-branches\n"
" - w : int (at line 38, column 13)\n"
" - z : string (at line 39, column 10)">>,
<<"Not a record type: string\n"
"arising from the projection of the field y (at line 22, column 38)">>,
<<"Not a record type: string\n"
"arising from an assignment of the field y (at line 21, column 42)">>,
<<"Not a record type: string\n"
"arising from an assignment of the field y (at line 20, column 38)">>,
<<"Not a record type: string\n"
"arising from an assignment of the field y (at line 19, column 35)">>,
<<"Ambiguous record type with field y (at line 13, column 25) could be one of\n"
" - r (at line 4, column 10)\n"
" - r' (at line 5, column 10)">>,
<<"Repeated name x in pattern\n"
" x :: x (at line 26, column 7)">>,
<<"No record type with fields y, z (at line 14, column 22)">>,
<<"The field z is missing when constructing an element of type r2 (at line 15, column 24)">>,
<<"Record type r2 does not have field y (at line 15, column 22)">>]}
, {"init_type_error",
[<<"Cannot unify string\n"
" and map(int, int)\n"
"when checking that 'init' returns a value of type 'state' at line 7, column 3">>]}
, {"missing_state_type",
[<<"Cannot unify string\n"
" and ()\n"
"when checking that 'init' returns a value of type 'state' at line 5, column 3">>]}
, {"missing_fields_in_record_expression",
[<<"The field x is missing when constructing an element of type r('a) (at line 7, column 40)">>,
<<"The field y is missing when constructing an element of type r(int) (at line 8, column 40)">>,
<<"The fields y, z are missing when constructing an element of type r('1) (at line 6, column 40)">>]}
, {"namespace_clash",
[<<"The contract Call (at line 4, column 10) has the same name as a namespace at (builtin location)">>]}
, {"bad_events",
[<<"The payload type int (at line 10, column 30) should be string">>,
<<"The payload type alias_address (at line 12, column 30) equals address but it should be string">>,
<<"The indexed type string (at line 9, column 25) is not a word type">>,
<<"The indexed type alias_string (at line 11, column 25) equals string which is not a word type">>]}
, {"bad_events2",
[<<"The event constructor BadEvent1 (at line 9, column 7) has too many non-indexed values (max 1)">>,
<<"The event constructor BadEvent2 (at line 10, column 7) has too many indexed values (max 3)">>,
<<"The event constructor BadEvent3 (at line 11, column 7) has too many non-indexed values (max 1)">>,
<<"The payload type address (at line 11, column 17) should be string">>,
<<"The payload type int (at line 11, column 26) should be string">>]}
, {"type_clash",
[<<"Cannot unify int\n"
" and string\n"
"when checking the record projection at line 12, column 40\n"
" r.foo : (gas : int, value : int) => Remote.themap\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" (gas : int, value : int) => map(string, int)">>]}
, {"bad_include_and_ns",
[<<"Include of 'included.aes' at line 2, column 11\nnot allowed, include only allowed at top level.">>,
<<"Nested namespace not allowed\nNamespace 'Foo' at line 3, column 13 not defined at top level.">>]}
, {"bad_address_literals",
[<<"The type bytes(32) is not a contract type\n"
"when checking that the contract literal at line 32, column 5\n"
" ct_Ez6MyeTMm17YnTnDdHTSrzMEBKmy7Uz2sXu347bTDPgVH2ifJ\n"
"has the type\n"
" bytes(32)">>,
<<"The type oracle(int, bool) is not a contract type\n"
"when checking that the contract literal at line 30, column 5\n"
" ct_Ez6MyeTMm17YnTnDdHTSrzMEBKmy7Uz2sXu347bTDPgVH2ifJ\n"
"has the type\n"
" oracle(int, bool)">>,
<<"The type address is not a contract type\n"
"when checking that the contract literal at line 28, column 5\n"
" ct_Ez6MyeTMm17YnTnDdHTSrzMEBKmy7Uz2sXu347bTDPgVH2ifJ\n"
"has the type\n"
" address">>,
<<"Cannot unify oracle_query('1, '2)\n"
" and Remote\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 25, column 5\n"
" oq_2oRvyowJuJnEkxy58Ckkw77XfWJrmRgmGaLzhdqb67SKEL1gPY :\n"
" oracle_query('1, '2)\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" Remote">>,
<<"Cannot unify oracle_query('3, '4)\n"
" and bytes(32)\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 23, column 5\n"
" oq_2oRvyowJuJnEkxy58Ckkw77XfWJrmRgmGaLzhdqb67SKEL1gPY :\n"
" oracle_query('3, '4)\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" bytes(32)">>,
<<"Cannot unify oracle_query('5, '6)\n"
" and oracle(int, bool)\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 21, column 5\n"
" oq_2oRvyowJuJnEkxy58Ckkw77XfWJrmRgmGaLzhdqb67SKEL1gPY :\n"
" oracle_query('5, '6)\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" oracle(int, bool)">>,
<<"Cannot unify oracle('7, '8)\n"
" and Remote\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 18, column 5\n"
" ok_2YNyxd6TRJPNrTcEDCe9ra59SVUdp9FR9qWC5msKZWYD9bP9z5 :\n"
" oracle('7, '8)\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" Remote">>,
<<"Cannot unify oracle('9, '10)\n"
" and bytes(32)\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 16, column 5\n"
" ok_2YNyxd6TRJPNrTcEDCe9ra59SVUdp9FR9qWC5msKZWYD9bP9z5 :\n"
" oracle('9, '10)\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" bytes(32)">>,
<<"Cannot unify oracle('11, '12)\n"
" and oracle_query(int, bool)\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 14, column 5\n"
" ok_2YNyxd6TRJPNrTcEDCe9ra59SVUdp9FR9qWC5msKZWYD9bP9z5 :\n"
" oracle('11, '12)\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" oracle_query(int, bool)">>,
<<"Cannot unify address\n"
" and oracle(int, bool)\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 11, column 5\n"
" ak_2gx9MEFxKvY9vMG5YnqnXWv1hCsX7rgnfvBLJS4aQurustR1rt : address\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" oracle(int, bool)">>,
<<"Cannot unify address\n"
" and Remote\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 9, column 5\n"
" ak_2gx9MEFxKvY9vMG5YnqnXWv1hCsX7rgnfvBLJS4aQurustR1rt : address\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" Remote">>,
<<"Cannot unify address\n"
" and bytes(32)\n"
"when checking the type of the expression at line 7, column 5\n"
" ak_2gx9MEFxKvY9vMG5YnqnXWv1hCsX7rgnfvBLJS4aQurustR1rt : address\n"
"against the expected type\n"
" bytes(32)">>]}
].