QPQ-AG/sophia
10
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 41 Pull Requests 5 Actions Packages Projects Releases 16 Wiki Activity

Recursive datatypes #200

New Issue
Open
opened 2019-12-09 21:37:32 +09:00 by zxq9 · 4 comments
zxq9 commented 2019-12-09 21:37:32 +09:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)
Copy Link

Created by: UlfNorell

*Created by: UlfNorell*
zxq9 commented 2019-12-09 21:38:33 +09:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)
Copy Link

Created by: UlfNorell

Might get away without VM changes if we disallow recursive types crossing contract boundaries to begin with.

*Created by: UlfNorell* Might get away without VM changes if we disallow recursive types crossing contract boundaries to begin with.
zxq9 commented 2019-12-11 08:26:04 +09:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)
Copy Link

Created by: nikita-fuchs

There might be a use case here, but no real necessity that's worth the high effort imho.

*Created by: nikita-fuchs* There might be a use case here, but no real necessity that's worth the high effort imho.
zxq9 commented 2020-03-27 10:13:57 +09:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)
Copy Link

Created by: radrow

@UlfNorell How does it break the consensus?

*Created by: radrow* @UlfNorell How does it break the consensus?
zxq9 commented 2020-03-27 14:50:06 +09:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)
Copy Link

Created by: UlfNorell

There's currently no way to represent a recursive type in the FATE type language, so it needs some VM support.

*Created by: UlfNorell* There's currently no way to represent a recursive type in the FATE type language, so it needs some VM support.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
WIP
bug
consensus-breaking
dependencies
documentation
duplicate
effort: high
effort: low
effort: medium
effort: trivial
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
maintenance
question
task/feature
todo-in-rewrite
wontfix
bug
Something is not working
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
New feature
help wanted
Need some help
invalid
Something is wrong
pig lipstick
Muggle-facing enhancements
question
More information is needed
wontfix
This won't be fixed
No Label
consensus-breaking
effort: high
enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: QPQ-AG/sophia#200
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?