Check contracts and entrypoints modifiers when implementing interfaces (#427)

* Check contracts and entrypoints modifiers when implementing interfaces

* Fix existing tests

* Add passing tests

* Add failing tests

* Update docs

* Update CHANGELOG
This commit is contained in:
Gaith Hallak 2022-11-17 11:40:57 +03:00 committed by GitHub
parent 83abfae32b
commit 256df25af4
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
12 changed files with 168 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
- Return a mapping from variables to FATE registers in the compilation output.
### Changed
- Type definitions serialised to ACI as `typedefs` field instead of `type_defs` to increase compatibility.
- Check contracts and entrypoints modifiers when implementing interfaces.
### Removed
### Fixed
- Typechecker crashes if Chain.create or Chain.clone are used without arguments.

View File

@ -191,6 +191,17 @@ contract interface X : Z =
entrypoint z() = 1
```
#### Adding or removing modifiers
When a `contract` or a `contract interface` implements another `contract interface`, the `payable` and `stateful` modifiers can be kept or changed, both in the contract and in the entrypoints, according to the following rules:
1. A `payable` contract or interface can implement a `payable` interface or a non-`payable` interface.
2. A non-`payable` contract or interface can only implement a non-`payable` interface, and cannot implement a `payable` interface.
3. A `payable` entrypoint can implement a `payable` entrypoint or a non-`payable` entrypoint.
4. A non-`payable` entrypoint can only implement a non-`payable` entrypoint, and cannot implement a `payable` entrypoint.
5. A non-`stateful` entrypoint can implement a `stateful` entrypoint or a non-`stateful` entrypoint.
6. A `stateful` entrypoint can only implement a `stateful` entrypoint, and cannot implement a non-`stateful` entrypoint.
#### Subtyping and variance
Subtyping in Sophia follows common rules that take type variance into account. As described by [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covariance_and_contravariance_(computer_science)),

View File

@ -906,6 +906,7 @@ infer1(Env0, [Contract0 = {Contract, Ann, ConName, Impls, Code} | Rest], Acc, Op
contract -> ets_insert(defined_contracts, {qname(ConName)});
contract_interface -> ok
end,
check_contract_preserved_payability(Env, ConName, Ann, Impls, Acc, What),
populate_functions_to_implement(Env, ConName, Impls, Acc),
Env1 = bind_contract(untyped, Contract0, Env),
{Env2, Code1} = infer_contract_top(push_scope(contract, ConName, Env1), What, Code, Options),
@ -931,6 +932,25 @@ infer1(Env, [{pragma, _, _} | Rest], Acc, Options) ->
%% Pragmas are checked in check_modifiers
infer1(Env, Rest, Acc, Options).
-spec check_contract_preserved_payability(env(), Con, Ann, Impls, Contracts, Kind) -> ok | no_return() when
Con :: aeso_syntax:con(),
Ann :: aeso_syntax:ann(),
Impls :: [Con],
Contracts :: [aeso_syntax:decl()],
Kind :: contract | contract_interface.
check_contract_preserved_payability(Env, ContractName, ContractAnn, Impls, DefinedContracts, Kind) ->
Payable = proplists:get_value(payable, ContractAnn, false),
ImplsNames = [ name(I) || I <- Impls ],
Interfaces = [ Con || I = {contract_interface, _, Con, _, _} <- DefinedContracts,
lists:member(name(Con), ImplsNames),
aeso_syntax:get_ann(payable, I, false) ],
create_type_errors(),
[ type_error({unpreserved_payablity, Kind, ContractName, I}) || I <- Interfaces, Payable == false ],
destroy_and_report_type_errors(Env),
ok.
%% Report all functions that were not implemented by the contract ContractName.
-spec report_unimplemented_functions(env(), ContractName) -> ok | no_return() when
ContractName :: aeso_syntax:con().
@ -1487,19 +1507,37 @@ check_reserved_entrypoints(Funs) ->
check_fundecl(Env, {fun_decl, Ann, Id = {id, _, Name}, Type = {fun_t, _, _, _, _}}) ->
Type1 = {fun_t, _, Named, Args, Ret} = check_type(Env, Type),
TypeSig = {type_sig, Ann, none, Named, Args, Ret},
register_implementation(Name),
register_implementation(Id, TypeSig),
{{Name, TypeSig}, {fun_decl, Ann, Id, Type1}};
check_fundecl(Env, {fun_decl, Ann, Id = {id, _, Name}, Type}) ->
type_error({fundecl_must_have_funtype, Ann, Id, Type}),
{{Name, {type_sig, Ann, none, [], [], Type}}, check_type(Env, Type)}.
%% Register the function FunName as implemented by deleting it from the functions
%% Register the function FunId as implemented by deleting it from the functions
%% to be implemented table if it is included there, or return true otherwise.
-spec register_implementation(FunName) -> true | no_return() when
FunName :: string().
register_implementation(Name) ->
-spec register_implementation(FunId, FunSig) -> true | no_return() when
FunId :: aeso_syntax:id(),
FunSig :: typesig().
register_implementation(Id, Sig) ->
Name = name(Id),
case ets_lookup(functions_to_implement, Name) of
[{Name, _, {fun_decl, _, _, _}}] ->
[{Name, Interface, Decl = {fun_decl, _, DeclId, _}}] ->
DeclStateful = aeso_syntax:get_ann(stateful, Decl, false),
DeclPayable = aeso_syntax:get_ann(payable, Decl, false),
SigEntrypoint = aeso_syntax:get_ann(entrypoint, Sig, false),
SigStateful = aeso_syntax:get_ann(stateful, Sig, false),
SigPayable = aeso_syntax:get_ann(payable, Sig, false),
[ type_error({function_should_be_entrypoint, Id, DeclId, Interface})
|| not SigEntrypoint ],
[ type_error({entrypoint_cannot_be_stateful, Id, DeclId, Interface})
|| SigStateful andalso not DeclStateful ],
[ type_error({entrypoint_must_be_payable, Id, DeclId, Interface})
|| not SigPayable andalso DeclPayable ],
ets_delete(functions_to_implement, Name);
[] ->
true;
@ -1509,9 +1547,9 @@ register_implementation(Name) ->
infer_nonrec(Env, LetFun) ->
create_constraints(),
NewLetFun = {{FunName, _}, _} = infer_letfun(Env, LetFun),
NewLetFun = {{_, Sig}, _} = infer_letfun(Env, LetFun),
check_special_funs(Env, NewLetFun),
register_implementation(FunName),
register_implementation(get_letfun_id(LetFun), Sig),
solve_then_destroy_and_report_unsolved_constraints(Env),
Result = {TypeSig, _} = instantiate(NewLetFun),
print_typesig(TypeSig),
@ -1540,8 +1578,8 @@ infer_letrec(Env, Defs) ->
ExtendEnv = bind_funs(Funs, Env),
Inferred =
[ begin
Res = {{Name, TypeSig}, _} = infer_letfun(ExtendEnv, LF),
register_implementation(Name),
Res = {{Name, TypeSig}, LetFun} = infer_letfun(ExtendEnv, LF),
register_implementation(get_letfun_id(LetFun), TypeSig),
Got = proplists:get_value(Name, Funs),
Expect = typesig_to_fun_t(TypeSig),
unify(Env, Got, Expect, {check_typesig, Name, Got, Expect}),
@ -1593,6 +1631,9 @@ infer_letfun1(Env0 = #env{ namespace = NS }, {letfun, Attrib, Fun = {id, NameAtt
{{Name, TypeSig},
{letfun, Attrib, {id, NameAttrib, Name}, TypedArgs, ResultType, NewGuardedBodies}}.
get_letfun_id({fun_clauses, _, Id, _, _}) -> Id;
get_letfun_id({letfun, _, Id, _, _, _}) -> Id.
desugar_clauses(Ann, Fun, {type_sig, _, _, _, ArgTypes, RetType}, Clauses) ->
NeedDesugar =
case Clauses of
@ -3659,7 +3700,7 @@ mk_error({empty_record_definition, Ann, Name}) ->
Msg = io_lib:format("Empty record definitions are not allowed. Cannot define the record `~s`", [Name]),
mk_t_err(pos(Ann), Msg);
mk_error({unimplemented_interface_function, ConId, InterfaceName, FunName}) ->
Msg = io_lib:format("Unimplemented function `~s` from the interface `~s` in the contract `~s`", [FunName, InterfaceName, pp(ConId)]),
Msg = io_lib:format("Unimplemented entrypoint `~s` from the interface `~s` in the contract `~s`", [FunName, InterfaceName, pp(ConId)]),
mk_t_err(pos(ConId), Msg);
mk_error({referencing_undefined_interface, InterfaceId}) ->
Msg = io_lib:format("Trying to implement or extend an undefined interface `~s`", [pp(InterfaceId)]),
@ -3707,6 +3748,29 @@ mk_error({interface_implementation_conflict, Contract, I1, I2, Fun}) ->
"the contract `~s` have a function called `~s`",
[name(I1), name(I2), name(Contract), name(Fun)]),
mk_t_err(pos(Contract), Msg);
mk_error({function_should_be_entrypoint, Impl, Base, Interface}) ->
Msg = io_lib:format("`~s` must be declared as an entrypoint instead of a function "
"in order to implement the entrypoint `~s` from the interface `~s`",
[name(Impl), name(Base), name(Interface)]),
mk_t_err(pos(Impl), Msg);
mk_error({entrypoint_cannot_be_stateful, Impl, Base, Interface}) ->
Msg = io_lib:format("`~s` cannot be stateful because the entrypoint `~s` in the "
"interface `~s` is not stateful",
[name(Impl), name(Base), name(Interface)]),
mk_t_err(pos(Impl), Msg);
mk_error({entrypoint_must_be_payable, Impl, Base, Interface}) ->
Msg = io_lib:format("`~s` must be payable because the entrypoint `~s` in the "
"interface `~s` is payable",
[name(Impl), name(Base), name(Interface)]),
mk_t_err(pos(Impl), Msg);
mk_error({unpreserved_payablity, Kind, ContractCon, InterfaceCon}) ->
KindStr = case Kind of
contract -> "contract";
contract_interface -> "interface"
end,
Msg = io_lib:format("Non-payable ~s `~s` cannot implement payable interface `~s`",
[KindStr, name(ContractCon), name(InterfaceCon)]),
mk_t_err(pos(ContractCon), Msg);
mk_error(Err) ->
Msg = io_lib:format("Unknown error: ~p", [Err]),
mk_t_err(pos(0, 0), Msg).

View File

@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ compilable_contracts() ->
"polymorphism_variance_switching_chain_create",
"polymorphism_variance_switching_void_supertype",
"polymorphism_variance_switching_unify_with_interface_decls",
"polymorphism_preserve_or_add_payable_contract",
"polymorphism_preserve_or_add_payable_entrypoint",
"polymorphism_preserve_or_remove_stateful_entrypoint",
"missing_init_fun_state_unit",
"complex_compare_leq",
"complex_compare",
@ -868,7 +871,7 @@ failing_contracts() ->
" - line 9, column 5">>])
, ?TYPE_ERROR(polymorphism_contract_missing_implementation,
[<<?Pos(4,20)
"Unimplemented function `f` from the interface `I1` in the contract `I2`">>
"Unimplemented entrypoint `f` from the interface `I1` in the contract `I2`">>
])
, ?TYPE_ERROR(polymorphism_contract_same_decl_multi_interface,
[<<?Pos(7,10)
@ -1152,6 +1155,26 @@ failing_contracts() ->
"to arguments\n"
" `Chain.create : (value : int, var_args) => 'c`">>
])
, ?TYPE_ERROR(polymorphism_add_stateful_entrypoint,
[<<?Pos(5,25)
"`f` cannot be stateful because the entrypoint `f` in the interface `I` is not stateful">>
])
, ?TYPE_ERROR(polymorphism_change_entrypoint_to_function,
[<<?Pos(6,14)
"`f` must be declared as an entrypoint instead of a function in order to implement the entrypoint `f` from the interface `I`">>
])
, ?TYPE_ERROR(polymorphism_non_payable_contract_implement_payable,
[<<?Pos(4,10)
"Non-payable contract `C` cannot implement payable interface `I`">>
])
, ?TYPE_ERROR(polymorphism_non_payable_interface_implement_payable,
[<<?Pos(4,20)
"Non-payable interface `H` cannot implement payable interface `I`">>
])
, ?TYPE_ERROR(polymorphism_remove_payable_entrypoint,
[<<?Pos(5,16)
"`f` must be payable because the entrypoint `f` in the interface `I` is payable">>
])
].
validation_test_() ->

View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
contract interface I =
entrypoint f : () => int
contract C : I =
stateful entrypoint f() = 1

View File

@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
contract interface I =
entrypoint f : () => int
contract C : I =
entrypoint init() = ()
function f() = 1

View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
payable contract interface I =
payable entrypoint f : () => int
contract C : I =
entrypoint f() = 123

View File

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
payable contract interface I =
payable entrypoint f : () => int
contract interface H : I =
payable entrypoint f : () => int
payable contract C : H =
entrypoint f() = 123

View File

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
contract interface F =
entrypoint f : () => int
payable contract interface G : F =
payable entrypoint f : () => int
entrypoint g : () => int
payable contract interface H =
payable entrypoint h : () => int
payable contract C : G, H =
payable entrypoint f() = 1
payable entrypoint g() = 2
payable entrypoint h() = 3

View File

@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
contract interface I =
payable entrypoint f : () => int
entrypoint g : () => int
contract C : I =
payable entrypoint f() = 1
payable entrypoint g() = 2

View File

@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
contract interface I =
stateful entrypoint f : () => int
stateful entrypoint g : () => int
contract C : I =
stateful entrypoint f() = 1
entrypoint g() = 2

View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
contract interface I =
payable entrypoint f : () => int
contract C : I =
entrypoint f() = 1