QPQ-AG/public-wiki
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update The Internet of Economics%2C the Gajumaru %26 QPQ Un-White Paper

Cecille de Jesus 2026-03-05 20:20:27 +09:00
parent a34d091f19
commit 67965fcd68
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
The Internet of Economics%252C the Gajumaru %2526 QPQ Un-White Paper.-.md

@ -2484,7 +2484,7 @@ This three-way distinction separates genuine architectural innovation from regul
GajuDEX is a set of smart contracts deployable on any chain running the Sophia language and FATE virtual machine. **The previous section described the principle: any Associate Chain operator can deploy GajuDEX with their own currency alongside the Gaju.**
QPQ will deploy GajuDEX in two environments, Groot and a Known Proof of Stake Associate Chain (‘KPoS AC’) that provides institutional-grade throughput within a governed framework. This is the RPA/RIPA model at commercial scale: the same protocol, two paths, genuine choice between them.
QPQ will deploy GajuDEX in two environments, Groot and a Known Proof of Stake Associate Chain (KPoS AC) that provides institutional-grade throughput within a governed framework. This is the RPA/RIPA model at commercial scale: the same protocol, two paths, genuine choice between them.
**The first deployment operates directly on Groot, the governance-free resource layer.** Every trade settles through the same proof-of-work consensus that secures the Gaju itself. No validators to trust. No operators to identify. No jurisdiction to defer to. The exchange inherits Groot's full security properties: settlement certainty accumulating rapidly from first microblock inclusion, commerce-grade within seconds, and absolute irrevocable finality at two keyblocks - four minutes - for any transaction regardless of value. Accordingly, this will not be the fastest exchange in the world - that is the price of operating on a trustless resource layer. But, for users who require absolute neutrality, who cannot or will not trust any operator, or who operate across jurisdictions without shared legal frameworks, Groot is the only exchange environment where no one can say no.
@ -2680,7 +2680,7 @@ All timelines are subject to Series A funding. A shortfall in funding would push
[112]: Mike Dudas (@mdudas), X post, 14 October 2025; reproduced in Incrypted, "Binance Responded to Accusations of Trying to Profit From Listing New Projects," 7 November 2025. https://incrypted.com/en/binance-responded-to-accusations-of-trying-to-profit-from-listing-new-projects/
[113]: Simon Dedic (@sjdedic), X post, 31 October 2024; reported in CoinTelegraph, "Binance co-founder clarifies asset listing policies, dispels FUD," 3 November 2024. https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-co-founder-clarifies-binance-listing-policies
[114]: Coinbase, "Coinbase Listings Policy," accessed February 2026. https://listing.coinbase.com/policy
[115]: Andre Cronje (@AndreCronjeTech), X post, 3 November 2024; reproduced in The Block, "Coinbase accused of charging substantial 'listing fees' by Justin Sun and Andre Cronje," 4 November 2024. https://www.theblock.co/post/324328/justin-sun-andre-cronje-coinbase-binance-listing-fees
[115]: Andre Cronje (@AndreCronjeTech), X post, 3 November 2024; reproduced in The Block, "Coinbase accused of charging substantial "listing fees" by Justin Sun and Andre Cronje," 4 November 2024. https://www.theblock.co/post/324328/justin-sun-andre-cronje-coinbase-binance-listing-fees
[116]: Justin Sun, statement on X, 4 November 2024; reported in CryptoSlate, "Justin Sun and Andre Cronje challenge Coinbase's listing fee transparency claims," 4 November 2024. https://cryptoslate.com/justin-sun-and-andre-cronje-challenge-coinbases-listing-fee-transparency-claims/
[117]: FINMA, "Developments in FinTech," undated (current). FINMA's FinTech dossier states: "Decentralised trading platforms do not manage wallets for their clients" - the architectural distinction FINMA draws between platforms inside and outside its regulatory perimeter. The substance-over-form principle is established in FINMA's ICO Guidelines (2018): regulatory treatment follows economic substance, not legal label. https://www.finma.ch/en/documentation/dossier/dossier-fintech/entwicklungen-im-bereich-fintech/ and https://www.finma.ch/en/news/2018/02/20180216-mm-ico-wegleitung/
[118]: Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA), Recital 22, Official Journal of the European Union L 150, 9 June 2023, p. 1. "Where crypto-asset services are provided in a fully decentralised manner without any intermediary, they should not fall within the scope of this Regulation." The same recital confirms partial decentralisation does not qualify: where "part of such activities or services is performed in a decentralised manner," the regulation applies in full. MiCA became fully applicable from 30 December 2024 and applies in Liechtenstein as an EEA member state from 1 February 2025. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32023R1114
@ -2690,9 +2690,9 @@ All timelines are subject to Series A funding. A shortfall in funding would push
[122]: Coinpedia, "Decentralized Exchange (DEX) Market Report," 2024. Total DEX trading volume approximately $835 billion in 2023. https://coinpedia.org/research-report/decentralized-exchange-dex-market-report
[123]: Investopedia, "What Went Wrong with FTX?," updated 2024. https://www.investopedia.com/what-went-wrong-with-ftx-6828447
[124]: CryptoSlate, "DEX trading volumes spike as users leave CEXs en masse," 2022-2023. Daily DEX volumes approached $12 billion during market shocks following centralised exchange failures. https://cryptoslate.com/dex-trading-volumes-spike-as-users-leave-cexs-en-masse
[125]: The Block, "FTX-backed DEX Serum calls itself 'defunct,' promotes community fork," 17 December 2022. Serum's "update authority" was held solely by FTX insiders; the $400 million FTX hack compromised Serum's code security, leading Jupiter and Raydium to abandon the platform. https://www.theblock.co/post/190566/ftx-backed-dex-serum-calls-itself-defunct-promotes-community-fork
[125]: The Block, "FTX-backed DEX Serum calls itself "defunct," promotes community fork," 17 December 2022. Serum's "update authority" was held solely by FTX insiders; the $400 million FTX hack compromised Serum's code security, leading Jupiter and Raydium to abandon the platform. https://www.theblock.co/post/190566/ftx-backed-dex-serum-calls-itself-defunct-promotes-community-fork
[126]: TRM Labs, "Federal Judge Overturns All Criminal Convictions in Mango Markets Case Against Avraham Eisenberg," May 2025. Judge Subramanian vacated all convictions, finding Mango Markets had no terms of service, no prohibition against manipulation, and no requirement that loans be repaid. https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/breaking-federal-judge-overturns-all-criminal-convictions-in-mango-markets-case-against-avraham-eisenberg
[127]: The Block, "Paradex's 'free bitcoin' pricing glitch triggers mass liquidations, forces rollback," 19 January 2026. Database migration error priced Bitcoin at $0, triggering mass automated liquidations; Paradex rolled back the entire blockchain to a prior state. https://www.theblock.co/post/386128/paradexs-free-bitcoin-pricing-glitch-triggers-mass-liquidations-forces-rollback
[127]: The Block, "Paradex's "free bitcoin" pricing glitch triggers mass liquidations, forces rollback," 19 January 2026. Database migration error priced Bitcoin at $0, triggering mass automated liquidations; Paradex rolled back the entire blockchain to a prior state. https://www.theblock.co/post/386128/paradexs-free-bitcoin-pricing-glitch-triggers-mass-liquidations-forces-rollback
[128]: CoinTelegraph, "Timeline: Jelly token goes sour after $6M exploit on Hyperliquid," 28 March 2025. Documents the JELLY token price manipulation, Hyperliquid's validator response, and industry reaction including statements from Arthur Hayes and Bitget CEO Gracy Chen. https://cointelegraph.com/news/timeline-jelly-token-exploit-hyperliquid
[129]: Halborn, "Explained: The Hyperliquid Hack (March 2025)," 2 April 2025. Security analysis concluding that "the protocol revealed centralized control over market pricing." Details forced settlement at $0.0095 against a market price of approximately $0.50. https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-hyperliquid-hack-march-2025
[130]: Medium/@rabbit.io, "Hyperliquid: Has the Exchange Truly Become Decentralized?" October 2025. Analysis of validator stake concentration: Hyper Foundation controlled approximately 60.5% of total validator stake through direct node delegation. ~[https://medium.com/@rabbit.io/hyperliquid-has-the-exchange-truly-become-decentralized-0458aa1c5aa0](https://medium.com/@rabbit.io/hyperliquid-has-the-exchange-truly-become-decentralized-0458aa1c5aa0. IOSG Ventures, "Degen Arena for Battle: Hyperliquid," June 2025, placed effective Foundation control at 78.5% of total stake across 5 of 16 validators at the time of the JELLY incident, declining to approximately 65.3% by June 2025. ~[https://medium.com/iosg-ventures/degen-arena-for-battle-hyperliquid-0330d8db58b1](https://medium.com/iosg-ventures/degen-arena-for-battle-hyperliquid-0330d8db58b1